Do the Right Thing: “There it is. Love and Hate.”

Do the Right Thing poster

Do the Right Thing is motivated by and structured around ambiguities of knowledge, clashes of righteous views and irreconcilable communication problems. At one point, an argument between Mookie and his sister Jade (played by Lee’s own sister, Joie, herself a writer/director/producer) takes place in front of a wall that is shown to be graffiti’d with the statement “Tawana told the truth”. This refers to the Tawana Brawley rape allegations that surfaced in 1987. You can read the Grand Jury’s report on the investigation here, but the gist of it is that Brawley accused an unnamed group of white men of abducting her and subjecting her four days of sexual abuse in the woods before returning her in a rubbish bag. The Grand Jury found evidence to contradict her claims, and a New York prosector alleged to have been one of the attackers countered by successfully sueing for defamation.

Do the Right Thing: Spike Lee, Joie Lee

What are we to make of the slogan’s inclusion in the film? Is it one of Lee’s editorial flourishes, like the “Dump Koch” graffiti that represents the director’s admitted hopes for the outcome of the New York Mayoral elections? Is Lee so certain about Brawley’s allegations that he can confidently side with her in this way? Or is it a more subtle ploy? The argument undermines Mookie’s/Lee’s authority, and so the tension of the exchange fights with the unequivocal tone of the backdrop, where an assertion made publicly goes unchallenged. Whatever one’s opinions on the Brawley case, the inconsistencies in her story are enough to raise serious doubts. If you’ve ever read an interview with Spike Lee (there are some links at the bottom of this post), you’ll know that he’s a sparky character with very strong views that he’s not shy about sharing but, to his credit, Do the Right Thing shows the destructive, disunifying effects of entrenched prejudices and misdirected enmity. It shows a community under pressure from heat, disenfranchisement and municipal authorities whose petty problems pull the lids off deeply held historical resentments and create an explosion of violence that ends to nobody’s advantage.

The film finishes on the following pair of quotations, worth repeating here:

martin-luther-king-and-malcolm-xViolence as a way of achieving racial justice is both impractical and immoral. I am not unmindful of the fact that violence often brings about momentary results. Nations have frequently won their independence in battle. But in spite of temporary victories, violence never brings permanent peace. It solves no social problem: it merely creates new and more complicated ones. Violence is impractical because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all. It is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding: it seeks to annihilate rather than convert. Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love. It destroys community and makes brotherhood impossible. It leaves society in monologue rather than dialogue. Violence ends up defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. (Martin Luther King, Jr.)

I think there are plenty of good people in America, but there are also plenty of bad people in America and the bad ones are the ones who seem to have all the power and be in these positions to block things that you and I need. Because this is the situation, you and I have to preserve the right to do what is necessary to bring an end to that situation, and it doesn’t mean that I advocate violence, but at the same time I am not against using violence in self-defense. I don’t even call it violence when it’s self-defense. I call it intelligence. (Malcolm X)

The two activists are often portrayed as polarised in their views on how best to achieve civil rights for African-Americans, and Lee uses the two quotations to suggest the ambiguities and conflicts in the debate, but the picture  (above) that Smiley pins up in the smouldering shell of Sal’s pizzeria shows them united, harmonised, as if non-violence and direct action could be interchangeable selections from the same menu, or as if an insoluble difference of approaches to the same problem might be transcended by common cause. This is surely Lee’s most compelling, gripping film to date: he’s managed to balance the tonal diversity of his earliest elements to paint a nuanced portrait of a time and place where good people lose control. Most of the characters oscillate between worthiness, righteous indignation and ignoble inaction, making it difficult to take sides.


Even if one sympathises with Buggin’ Out’s plea for pictures of black cultural heroes on Sal’s Wall of Fame (it is, after all, a justifiable wish for proportional representation), he’s an obnoxious, aggravating figure who ignores the similar lack of Korean or Puerto Rican icons in the pizzeria. Nobody would support the chokehold killing of Radio Raheem by the police, but Lee refuses to make him a noble innocent; throughout the film he is an aggressive, threatening presence, accentuated by the closer-and-closer close-ups that the director pushes on the viewer.

Do the Right Thing: Radio Raheem (Bill Nunn)

This confrontational style is a key part of the film. Always fond of some direct address, Lee frequently makes his characters talk directly to the camera, or uses canted angles to dynamise dialogue scenes.

Do the Right Thing: Spike Leevlcsnap-169887

These techniques really come to the fore in a famous scene in which an argument over cultural representation between Mookie and Pino (John Turturro) reaches a stalemate and gives way to a montage of direct-to-camera torrents of racial abuse from various members of the community:


Ed Guerrero is very eloquent on the topic of the racial slur montage:

By pitting various races, identities and groups against each other on the rawest emotional level, regurgitating the vilest, innermost thoughts and stereotypes about one another, Do the Right Thing depicts the danger and futility of bigotry and racism at a personal level, from which no social formation is exempt. As importantly, this montage works to reveal the how of racism while not necessarily addressing the racism’s greater structural and strategic why. That is to say, this litany of racial slurs functions to show how racism works on the interpersonal level, between individuals as targets, representatives of groups, while, perhaps inadvertently, masking the greater why of racism’s workings at an institutional, structural level, as a strategy of hidden elites – “the powers that be” – to keep races, classes and movements divided and fighting among each other, thus distracted from the ignored or concealed, truth of their mutual exploitation. Notably, all of the participants of this montage as working-class males share the same gendered, social orientation. Rather than following Do the Right Thing‘s thematic hip-hop call to “fight the power”, these angry, isolated figures representing different races scapegoat and fight each other instead.

In these lists of racial slurs, many of the attacks resort to insults to cultural icons: Michael Jackson, Frank Sinatra, etc., and this thread runs through the film as characters use them as visible markers of ethnic difference. Buggin’ Out extrapolates a territorial argument from the scuffing of his Air Jordans, and then objects to the pictures of Italian Americans on Sal’s Wall of Fame; Mookie takes Pino to task for mouthing racist language while appreciating black athletes and musicians; Radio Raheem battles a group of Puerto Ricans over the relative volume of their music. INn all these instances cultural iconography seems to be territorial tags, masks for deeper ethnic hatred: it’s a struggle over the equal representation of cultural preferences, but also a transference of furious energy onto prominent symbols. This is summed up in a verse from Public Enemy‘s Fight the Power, which plays several times in the film:

Elvis was a hero to most
But he never meant shit to me you see
Straight up racist that sucker was
Simple and plain
Motherfuck him and John Wayne
Cause I’m black and I’m proud
I’m ready and hyped plus I’m amped
Most of my heroes dont appear on no stamps
Sample a look back you look and find
Nothing but rednecks for 400 years if you check
Dont worry be happy
Was a number one jam
Damn if I say it you can slap me right here
(get it) lets get this party started right
Right on, cmon
What we got to say
Power to the people no delay
To make everybody see
In order to fight the powers that be

The film’s title is a firm injunction to act positively, to take a stand, but it’s never quite clear what doing the “right thing” might be. Everyone seems to have a personal opinion about what is right. The most prominently contentious moment is when Mookie instigates the final assault on Sal’s by throwing a dustbin through the front window. This might be an altruistic gesture to divert attention from Sal and his sons, saving them from a mob attack, or he might just be taking sides, marking definitively his refusal to keep acting as neutral mediator between Sal and his objectors. But if this is taking a stand and “doing the right thing”, then it certainly doesn’t solve the roots of the problem. Just as with the team-up of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, it suggests that there might be many right things, and that right things are rarely easy, and might not make everything OK.

Do the Right Thing: Spike Lee


For a complete change of tone, one of my colleagues put me onto this great little mash-up of Do the Right Thing and Sesame Street (not suitable for kids – it really is brought to you by the letter “F”):

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

6 thoughts on “Do the Right Thing: “There it is. Love and Hate.”

  1. I recently watched ‘Do the Right Thing’ on DVD. I last saw it when it first came out theatrically. It’s a flawed, but good film, one of Lee’s better efforts. I’m admittedly no big fan of the director. He’s made movies that he’d be raising holy hell about if the exact same film had been made by a white director. Examples: ‘She’s Gotta Have It’ is about a young ‘promiscuous’ black woman and ‘Jungle Fever’ is about a man who cheats on his black wife by having an affair with a white woman. Talk about racial sterotypes! Leee became pretty wealthy by following the course that he did of making certain movies and writing books about making them. (I seem to remember that he bought Rober McNamara’s estate in Massachusettes a number of years ago.) When ‘She’s Gotta Have It’ came out I thought he might have a really great career ahead of him. But in my opinion he squandered his talents, which I have to admit are not inconsequential. See ‘Inside Man’ for example. ‘Do the Right Thing’ is definitely a film well worth watching, but when it comes to its addressing racial issues, Lee pretends to be playing if ‘fairly” and telling both sides of the story. But it’s clear where he really stands, and if you want to hear it clearly in his own words, watch the extras, especially the press conference in which he rants about Radio Raheem being murdered.

    • Thanks for your comments, Stan. I take your point that Lee’s political leanings often show up in his work and sometimes compromise them, especially in his attitudes to women: She Hate Me, with its parade of hot, executive lesbians, is especially problematic (though you can also see it undermining its male protagonists own homophobic, self-absorbed prejudices). But in Do the Right Thing, even if we know where the director stands (its an Afrocentric version of multicultural stalemate, for instance, and the Korean characters are troublingly denied a nuanced portrayal), it has an inbuilt complexity in its depictions of direct action – any of the characters’ certainties are undercut by flaws in their arguments; this is perhaps a product of interpretation: is it a coincidence that the Black nationalist Buggin’ Out is played by a half-Italian actor, or is it supposed to compromise his extreme position?

      I’m not sure Lee is condoning so much as exploring certain stereotypes. The key might be at the end of Jungle Fever, when it’s impossible to tell whether the central relationship was really the product of trans-racial curiosity, or if the couple had just internalised the objections of people around them, i.e. you can’t easily decide whether or not they really liked each other and were destroyed by other people’s prejudices, or if they really were just indulging a racist fascination. Snipes’ character might feel certain about it, but we have no compulsion to believe that he’s right.

      As I recall, Lee’s rant about Raheem’s killing was in response to the number of critics who condemned the destruction of Sal’s pizzeria (nobody really thinks that was a good outcome) but in the rush to focus on property damage, they conveniently forgot about the life that had been lost. What is a proportional justified response? What is righteous anger, and when does it outweigh the loss of life? These are never simple questions, and Lee is a smart enough filmmaker to make sure that, even if he has answered those questions very firmly for himself, there are always conflicting views. Any politically engaged artist is going to piss off a percentage of the audience, but the alternative is a cinema of inoffensive fence-sitting.

  2. Wow incredible. I don’t think I have had a chance to properly thank you for adding my blog to your blogroll. It is an honor to be affiliated with a blog that takes this much time and effort in bringing a movie to the masses. I haven’t seen this film in year and personally I think Spike lee is a jerk off but I can’t deny the powerful message conveyed in this particular film. I even liked his newer one Miracle at St. Anna. Anywho…fanastic job my friend!

    • No problem, Marcello. Your site is beautifully designed and prolific, so I’m happy to recommend it to any readers who might be passing through here. And I see you’ve just reviewed Totoro, which is surely one of the greatest children’s films ever made (and I don’t mean that disparagingly – it’s really a film about childhood for children, rather than a Disneyesque toy advertisement with innuendo for the adults).

  3. Pingback: Spike Lee Meets The Family Slaveowners « Burroughs Adding Machine

  4. Pingback: Spectacular Attractions Podcast #9 « Spectacular Attractions

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s