<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hitchcock: I Am a Cameo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drnorth.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/hitchcock-i-am-a-cameo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drnorth.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/hitchcock-i-am-a-cameo/</link>
	<description>film in all its forms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:36:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan North</title>
		<link>http://drnorth.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/hitchcock-i-am-a-cameo/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan North</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drnorth.wordpress.com/?p=705#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Hi, Julian,

I&#039;m always surprised by what gets a big readership, but it also depends on whether or not someone links to your blog from a better known site. My Tati and Tarr articles have had a lot of hits, although the &quot;180-degree rule&quot; is the one that gets searched for the most, probably by new film students. That&#039;s what it&#039;s there for...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Julian,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m always surprised by what gets a big readership, but it also depends on whether or not someone links to your blog from a better known site. My Tati and Tarr articles have had a lot of hits, although the &#8220;180-degree rule&#8221; is the one that gets searched for the most, probably by new film students. That&#8217;s what it&#8217;s there for&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julianayrs</title>
		<link>http://drnorth.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/hitchcock-i-am-a-cameo/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>julianayrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drnorth.wordpress.com/?p=705#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Dear Spectacular:

Great blog on Hitch!
In the past when I have written a piece or two on his style, the posts have usually attracted quite a few readers.
Still a legend!
Kind regards...
Julian Ayrs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Spectacular:</p>
<p>Great blog on Hitch!<br />
In the past when I have written a piece or two on his style, the posts have usually attracted quite a few readers.<br />
Still a legend!<br />
Kind regards&#8230;<br />
Julian Ayrs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan North</title>
		<link>http://drnorth.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/hitchcock-i-am-a-cameo/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan North</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drnorth.wordpress.com/?p=705#comment-203</guid>
		<description>hi, Catherine,

I think you&#039;re right. I was trying to find a frame grab to prove it, but that&#039;s definitely GVS talking to pseudo-Hitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, Catherine,</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right. I was trying to find a frame grab to prove it, but that&#8217;s definitely GVS talking to pseudo-Hitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan North</title>
		<link>http://drnorth.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/hitchcock-i-am-a-cameo/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan North</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drnorth.wordpress.com/?p=705#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Matthew, according to Rosenbaum:

&quot;However, “only convention” has persuaded us that Renoir pinks don’t have a legitimate place on a van Gogh canvas, and the minute someone with money decides, rightly or wrongly, that more money can be made by applying them, you can bet that some reviewer somewhere will be waiting to offer aesthetic justifications for the maneuver.&quot;

You see that reviewer? That&#039;s you that is. 

Goodness, I haven&#039;t done that joke since the 90s. Seriously, though, I&#039;ll check out the Criteriuon thread...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew, according to Rosenbaum:</p>
<p>&#8220;However, “only convention” has persuaded us that Renoir pinks don’t have a legitimate place on a van Gogh canvas, and the minute someone with money decides, rightly or wrongly, that more money can be made by applying them, you can bet that some reviewer somewhere will be waiting to offer aesthetic justifications for the maneuver.&#8221;</p>
<p>You see that reviewer? That&#8217;s you that is. </p>
<p>Goodness, I haven&#8217;t done that joke since the 90s. Seriously, though, I&#8217;ll check out the Criteriuon thread&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine Grant</title>
		<link>http://drnorth.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/hitchcock-i-am-a-cameo/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drnorth.wordpress.com/?p=705#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Hi. Great post. Thanks. If my memory serves me correct (and it is sometimes a bit ropey...), in Gus Van -Sant&#039;s Psycho, the Hitch-lookalike chats to Van Sant outside Marion&#039;s office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Great post. Thanks. If my memory serves me correct (and it is sometimes a bit ropey&#8230;), in Gus Van -Sant&#8217;s Psycho, the Hitch-lookalike chats to Van Sant outside Marion&#8217;s office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
